Download the document PDF (187 Kb)
It’s easy to think of peace as the absence of hostility, conflict or war, or in a more internal sense as not feeling stress, anxiety or emotional distress. Yet some of the most encompassing and enriching views of peace (e.g., shalom) do not regard it merely in negative terms as being unencumbered by outward strife or inward turmoil. Rather they invite us to see it in a much more holistic and positive way as the enjoyment of harmony, prosperity, wellbeing, supportive and constructive relationships.
In a similar fashion, we tend to think of health within a “pathogenic” paradigm, as not suffering from some disease, and of mental health as the absence of a psychological illness or disorder. But as historian of medicine H.E. Sigerist recognized in the last century, health is more, something positive. The World Health Organization has defined it with a more “salutogenic” thrust, as a state of comprehensive physical, mental and social wellbeing that accordingly applies at both a personal and collective level.
For individuals this would, on the mental health front, involve a state in which one “realizes his or her abilities, can cope with the normal stresses of life, can work productively and fruitfully, and is able to make a contribution to his or her community” (WHO). A more expanded statement describes mental health as “the capacity of each and all of us to feel, think, and act in ways that enhance our ability to enjoy life and deal with the challenges we face. It is a positive sense of emotional and spiritual well-being that respects the importance of culture, equity, social justice, interconnections and personal dignity” (N. Joubert & H. Raeburn). Corey Keyes has highlighted the construct of flourishing in contrast to languishing as a distinct axis or continuum of mental health that transcends the issue of whether or not a mental illness factors in. Flourishing involves characteristic maintenance of positive emotions along with typical ability to function in a positive manner both psychologically (self-acceptance, personal growth, purpose, environmental mastery, autonomy, positive relations) and socially (social acceptance, actualization, contribution, coherence, integration).
Mental health for individuals is not separate or isolated from the other dimensions of their overall personal well-being nor insulated and shielded from political, economic, material and social conditions around them. Multiple factors across those dimensions (as well as features present in the more intrapersonal biological and psychological domains) will have a bearing on mental health. A mentally healthy constituency would be one in which such influences are quite predominantly positive and improving for all subgroups that compose the populace, so that increasing numbers within their ranks are realizing that quality of and competence in life.
Health promotion has been described as “the process of enabling/empowering individuals and communities to gain control over the determinants of health and thereby improve their health” (I. Rootman et al.). Central to the pursuit are concepts of participation, empowerment and equity. The endeavour could be summed up in terms of building connectedness and literacy. A strong degree of connectedness will see shared assumption of responsibility and engagement of members in mutual efforts to enhance public well-being. Health literacy will involve increased ability to acquire information and use it in such a way as to ameliorate conditions that impinge on personal and collective health.
The social-ecological model of public health and health promotion reflects the multidirectional complexity and dynamic interplay among factors operating within and across respective levels from macro (societal) through micro (individual). These factors play out so that environments affect people personally and corporately while singular and collective action can conversely have impact on an immediate or more extended milieu. The model likewise respects the reality that intervention can be made at a variety of points to strengthen resilience and remove or reduce negative features, and that complementary activity on several fronts can produce greater combined benefit than initiatives concentrated only on one level or area. As such it calls for interdisciplinary collaborative efforts to adequately address the diversity of issues that bear on the health of a community of people. It thus provides a matrix for determining and directing strategies that can together comprise a consistent, coherent response with cumulative force to effect positive change in the settings of concern (G. Bauer et al.; D. Stokols).
Socio-Ecological Model of Health Promotion (adapted from G. Bauer et al., 2003)
Effective mental health promotion involves applying the cycle of health promotion action phases to a particular mental health issue (problems and determinants) within two or more of the nested ecological systems in order to impact health development (by acting on influences and so changing outcomes).
How has your campus addressed challenges to mental health in more ways than intervening on an individual level? What steps (incl. policy stances) have you taken to mitigate factors that contribute to mental health problems in your community and strengthen elements that militate against ills arising?